On 11Apr2016 19:20, Andrej N. Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote:
Cameron Simpson has written on Saturday, 9 April, at 9:24:
I think choosing git vs hg should not be a "what is more popular" decision,
_especially_ for projects (versus users individually). IMO opinion hg is
superior. Also, there's a robust hg-git extension that will talk to git
repositories using hg.
I'm sorry to tell you that but in my experience git is superior compared
to hg, some things which require few long command lines in hg can be done
with one short (so less error-prone) command in git.
Yes, there are corner cases for each.
Yes, that's opposite
to your experience. And note that there is a similar tool for git (which
allows work with hg repos). :)
So I've found.
Anyways, hg is GUI-oriented while git is CLI-oriented so I would say, the
whole "git vs hg" thing is human-related one, i.e. it's about what's more
comfortable for people, but feature-wide they are not too far away.
GUI related? I don't think I've _ever_ used a GUI for hg except by accident
when some GUI merge tool popped up one day, quickly banished.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <[email protected]>
