On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:19:35AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I don't think that a *series* of patches is useful, at least for the > integration in the main branch. The use of window structures should > be seen as a single feature as a whole. Thus a single commit should > be fine. > i won't argue about this change in particular, but as a general statement this is definitely wrong: the usual structure of a patch series should be 0-N necessary refactorings, followed by the actual bug fix(es) and/or feature(s).
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Richard Russon
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Change Mut... Oswald Buddenhagen
- Re: [PATCH 9 of 11] Change remailer to use mutt windows... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 10 of 11] Fix remaining direct usages of COL... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] Add cols parameter to mutt_FormatS... Kevin J. McCarthy
