* On 05 Sep 2016, Lorenzo wrote: Apparently some hook failed to trigger. That was me.
> > Is strfcpy() widely available? For instance, on the machine I'm using > > No. (It's a macro in mutt, so it's fine. I'm speaking to whether it's a general thing, which seemed to be Derek's question.) > overhead to simply check strlen(src) <=> sizeof(dst)-off. Maybe we > want another mutt_safe_foobaz. I don't care , but if we're going to > be niggly about it let's decide what the standard/goal is rather than > freewheeling on specific lines of code ad hoc. To be clear, I'm totally fine with Kevin's suggested change, and will make it. I just don't want acceptance of a single patch to depend on an open-ended discussion about mutt's preferred style or the broader issues of C string safety. That's a trap we get into far too often in these parts. -- David Champion • [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
