On 2016-09-06 12:44:21 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:39:18PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > > Quick question, mutt has snprintf.c which implements snprintf and > > vsnprintf. Now that mutt requires a C99 compiler, is this file (and > > checks in configure) still needed? > > Probably not. I'm not really in a hurry to rip it out, though. > Vincent, Derek, what do you think?
Systems may have a C99 compiler but not necessarily snprintf. In general, the compiler and the C library are provided by different people. Now, I don't know whether there are still platforms without snprintf. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
