Hi Kevin, On Sunday, 2019-05-19 14:28:09 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:03:17PM +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > Fedora packages the docbook2X version of docbook2texi as > > db2x_docbook2texi (in package docbook2X). The binary it provides as > > docbook2texi comes from RedHat's own docbook-tools: > > http://sources.redhat.com/docbook-tools/ > > which are packaged as docbook-utils, sic. > > That's helpful. Perhaps I can look for db2x_docbook2texi first, then. > However, if they don't have the docbook2texi package installed but have > docbook-tools installed it will fail on invocation. > > It looks like RedHat's docbook-tools is even older than docbook2x. I'm not > sure if docbook-tools is commonly installed. Do either of you think > this approach is feasible?
I haven't willingly installed docbook-utils, querying for dependencies it's docbook-utils-pdf and gtk-doc that require it, of which only gtk-doc can be responsible here. Which again might not be that rarely installed.. For completeness, having tried your kevin/gpgme-build-fix with docbook2X installed worked. Eike -- OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A Use LibreOffice! https://www.libreoffice.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
