On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 07:41:16PM -0500, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > I've never heard of acked-by -- what I just read here is all I know -- but > offhand, I think it's overkill for a project of Mutt's moderate size. Two > levels of formal review and bookkeeping seems like more than Mutt needs.
It is an overkill. We don't need a rigid framework and policy. That's part of the advantage of moving back to a free-form mailing list development environment. The commit messages can just include, "discussed by ...", "tested by ...", or whatever is relevant to the size and complexity of the patch.
