On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 08:02:49PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 06:54 +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:(replying to the sub-thread with Kurt lower): I realized the return type is actually ssize_t, but I chose to work with size_t in this case because of the:if (res < length_requested) { length_requested -= res; random_bytes += res; }I hope that code is not executed if the return value is -1.
Yup. That's exactly what I meant by making the code clearer. If res is type size_t, then it can't be -1 in that comparison.
-- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
