On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 17:31 -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
So it's seems like there will be many situations where where at least some of the recipients do have at least some of the referenced messages already in their mailbox -- and having the forwarded message tie into the existing thread could be useful to those recipients.)
If you want that, then why not send a reply, with the third person added as a recipient?
If forwarded messages included In-Reply-To: and References:, then how would they be substantially different from replies? Why have two commands that do approximately the same thing?
