RTFM. It's like, the Holy Grail of answers, or something.
Dan Lipofsky [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> My pageup/pagedown/home/end keys do not seem to do anything.
> They are listed as being bound to intelligent things when I hit '?'.
I would guess a termcap issue, ie those keys are not getting read properly.
> Is there a way to get a list of the current key bindings, broken down
> by map (i.e. generic, index, browser, etc)?
Use '?' for each map you want to view.
> Is there a way to get a list of functions that I can bind keys to?
RTFM, section 6. They're all listed under '?', though.
> Is there a way to run unbound functions (like M-x in emacs)?
:exec <function>
> Is there a way I can get a description of what a key is currently
> bound to (like C-h k <key> in emacs)?
'?'
> Is there a way to see my current list of aliases?
!less <your alias file>
Make it a macro if you need to.
> When new mail arrives, the index does not scroll down to show the new
> mail. It would be nice if it did.
You can just hit 'tab' to jump to it. Well, to the next new mail anyway.
> It would also be nice if it showed all the new mail on startup (if it
> fits on the screen). Currently it tends to just show the first line.
I don't understand the question.
> Can I set up mutt so that messages from mailing lists declared
> in my muttrc file get saved to a file named after the mailing list?
save-hook ~l +%B # if message was sent to a known list, default save box is
# <listname>
> And I would like all other messages to just prompt me for a name (i.e.
> have the default be '=' or '' and not named after the user - I don't
> like that scheme)?
Just type what you want, it'll auto-remove the default one when you hit a
key.
> Is there a way to make all the declared mailing lists also be
> aliases without entering them as aliases? I.e. I want to be
> able to just mail to 'mutt-users' instead of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
> Yes I could set up an alias for each of my mailing lists but it
> would be nicer to have it just work off the fact that they are lists.
This wouldn't work, since you don't have to give the full address for the
listname. So Mutt wouldn't know the address to use.
> Thanks for your help
Try RTFM'ing next time.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
PGP signature
