J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
> argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as
> easily.
Such arguments rarely lead to a useful exchange of information. They
more usually end up as "My computer can beat up your computer" type of
"discussion." Is your friend actually interested in learning from this
exchange, or does he just want to tell you how great his program is?
> I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
> offers, thebat offers. Why is the advantage of mutt, or any
> text-based email client?
If TheBat! does everything that he wants it to, then he should use it.
Mutt isn't trying to take over the world. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
