clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

>the opposite of unix thinking, where a number of independant little
>programs to their speciality bound into a framework by a smart and small
>operating system, which operates the same way.  your statement reveals
>micro$oft thinking:  give the users one big babel tower, and if they can't
>get their tasks done with it, it cannot be done at all!

<heresy> Sounds a lot like emacs thinking to me :)  <g,d&r>

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it.

Reply via email to