On 2000-05-20 17:08:37 -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> Thomas, I agree with the above.
*grin* I do know that I'm bad at documenting changes
myself.
> As a gently reminder, I saw your revised patch for the
> Gecos regex code and noticed that you removed the
> comments I had in the original code. Given the rather
> obscure terminology of GECOS and regex, don't you think
> at least one comment about what mutt_gecos_name does
> would be a good thing?
Actually, you are probably right about this. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
