Re: Why not include compressed folder support in official Mutt?

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Jason Helfman proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

>Sure it would. Why wouldn't it? If these are not incoming folders, does
>it matter? Well, I do know that gzip support is an unstable archiving
>method, or I have read, and that tar is much more effective.

I store old mails in tar.gz format.  Best of both worlds :)

-suresh


-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By trying, we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's, I
mean.
                -- Mark Twain