On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> > I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
> > required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
> >
> > The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
> > release 6.1.
> >
> > I think this may cause problems when this gets to a general release
> > version as one of mutt's major advantages is that it builds 'out of
> > the box' on most Unix/Linux systems without requiring any 'bleeding
> > edge' libraries.
>
> Hi,
>
> no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris.
> I was talking about iconv problem with Brendan Cully and we were making some
> tests and we decided, that ppl on solaris have to use libiconv.
>
I take your point about Solaris but it also required libiconv on a
RedHat 6.1 system.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
