Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that: > I don't know, I think the annoyance factor reduction is quite > significant, and that shouldn't be discounted. True, there are no real > material cost savings achievable at this point. As a sysadmin for a largish isp + portal, my interests center more around the cost factor ;) I prefer to do my spam blocking at the company mailserver ... and have procmail to deal with bozos I don't want to talk to, but wouldn't want to block across a dozen domains. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology. -- R. S. Barton
- Re: mailboxes (was Re: spamfilter ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: mailboxes (was Re: spamfilter ... Dave Pearson
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Duncan Watson
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Daniel J Peng
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Dave Ewart
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Jamie Novak
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Martin Treusch von Buttlar
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Mikko Hänninen
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Dave Pearson
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: spamfilter for procmail raf
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: spamfilter for procmail Bob Bell