On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 06:57:38PM +0100, Axel Bichler wrote: > No, not necessarily. Mutt could save the filesizes. If the size has > changed, new mail has arrived. Counting new mails could be pretty fast, if > the program would skip the known part (old size) of the mbox file and > parse the file from that point on. Mailbox sizes change for reasons other than new mail. -- Dave Pearson: | mutt.octet.filter - autoview octet-streams http://www.davep.org/ | mutt.vcard.filter - autoview simple vcards Mutt: | muttrc2html - muttrc -> HTML utility http://www.davep.org/mutt/ | muttrc.sl - Jed muttrc mode
- Re: Default mailbox display? [... Dave Pearson
- Reliably detecting/counting ne... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Dave Pearson
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Daniel Freedman
- Re: Default mailbox display? David T-G
- Re: Default mailbox display? David Pippenger
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dirk Ruediger
- Re: Default mailbox display? Axel Bichler
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Wilhelm Wienemann
- Re: Default mailbox display? Martin Schweizer
- Re: Default mailbox display? Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? Axel Bichler
- Re: Default mailbox display? Christoph Bugel
- Re: Default mailbox display? Pedro Melo
