On Tue 1.May'01 at 19:20:47 +0200 wrote "Rado S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have some messages with www/ftp URLs. To highlight them I use > > ------ QUOTE BEGIN ------ > color body black yellow '(ftp|www)(\.[^ ]+)+(/[^ ]*)*' > color body black white "[^\t ]+:([^\t ]*/[^\t ]*)+" > color body black green "(f|ht)tp://[^\t ]+" > color signature red black > ======= QUOTE END ======= > > This works in general. > > www.bla.org -> yellow > host:www.what/bla/fasel -> white > http://www.doamin.bla -> green > > For all eMails it works, except for 1 ! > Try the above color definitions and have a look on the eMail attached ! > If you can, tell me ... > > 1. why isn't the sig recognized and coloured right ? >From the source-code signatures are recognized and separated by "-- ". Why is this so ? Is it a RFC ? > 2. why is the URL at the bottom not green but white ??? > > When I comment out the white definition and restart mutt, the URL turns > green !!! It takes the _earliest_ matchposition rather than the biggest or first/last matching string. Only if match position is same it goes for size and finally it takes the last in order. I had to change the white pattern to: color body black white "[a-z0-9]+:([^\t ]*/[^\t ]*)+" to have the URL enclosed in <> to appear green. ------ QUOTE BEGIN ------ > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 17:53:11 2001 > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:43:37 -0600 (MDT) > From: Rado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Rado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Metaserver. > > Rob > > -- > > You guys are so unhip it's a wonder your bums don't fall off. > > - Zaphod Beeblebrox - The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy > > -- > > <http://www.ee.ualberta.ca/~kaut> > Electrical Engineering 1998 > University of Alberta > ======= QUOTE END ======= -- Rado S. eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Message is based on my knowledge: | So much to do, and only so little I'm not omniscient, take care! | time, no mercy, no hope.
