I'm new at this but,
?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
> > It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
> > several times.
>
> Well, I have yet to see a good explanation why this choice has been
> made. I am also still searching for a convenient way to use an old
> message as template for a new one, without having to remember to
> manually save the new one.
>
> IMO, this is a quite serious problem, as it in fact makes the user lose
> data if he's not careful every time he uses this functionality. I have
> lost a handful of e-mails this way, meaning that short of sending the
> recipient another e-mail demanding the he send me back what I wrote to
> him, I have no way of recording what I have written.
>
> At least, I would very much appreciate a configuration variable by which
> you could choose which behavior is desirable.
>
> Jesper
>
> --
> Jesper Holmberg |"But how can |
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | one be warm |
> ENST Br, BP 832, 29285 Brest, FRANCE | alone?" |
--
Pat Shanahan <***[EMAIL PROTECTED]***>
Registered Linux User #207535
(Registered at: http://counter.li.org)
