On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:21:42PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Sunday, 28 October 2001 at 04:48, Russell Hoover wrote: > > > > It just seems to me that the longer it goes on, the more difficult it will > > be for stable-branch users to make the change-over to a mutt-1.4.0 or > > whatever, as so many things will have changed so radically. > > I don't think the number of big changes is that bad.
That's right. I've been using 1.2.5 until 1.3.23 was out, since I could not compile some earlier 1.3.x versions and was lazy to find out why. 1.3.23 compiled nicely and indeed worked quite smoothly out-of-the-box with my 1.2.5 config files. I only made changes to take advantage of new and enhanced features. I've been using it since (over IMAP/GSSAPI) and it works great, thanks developers! IMAP works faster and deleting attachments over IMAP now works (was never working in 1.2.5i for me). Have not seen any bugs, so I would recommend 1.2.23 to anybody. I would even vote for calling it 1.4.0! Best, Petr
