On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:33:28PM +0000, Lars Hecking ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Bruno Postle writes: > > On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > > > > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":) > > > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of > > that email? > > I never saw it because it was rejected on my mail gateway. > > Yes, Rich's message was infected with the SirCam virus. The pgp sig was > attachment 3, the virus was attachment 4. You can inspect the complete > message at > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users&m=100480801725434&w=2 > > This is quite interesting. Attachment 4 is a complete message to the list > moderator (Steve K), so I'm wondering where and how exactly it got attached. > It doesn't look like the virus came from Rich (which would have surprised > me massively ;-)
Weird. The non-PGP-signed bits didn't originate here (only windows here point over the lawn), and best as I can tell from a copy forwarded to me is that there was some mailbox corruption at gbnet. Or at least that's what the formfeeds in the Return-Path of the message that got appended to mine suggest to me :-) For those who need to investigate, I've put a copy of the message up on the Web: http://www.lafferty.ca/misc/mutt-list-sircam-foo I'd recommend grabbing it with wget and looking at it in your favorite pager, rather than in a browser. Those who saw it and thought "This last part wasn't signed! It must not be from Rich!" get brownie points. Those that didn't need to read their PGP manuals again :-) Cheers, -Rich -- Rich Lafferty --------------+----------------------------------------------- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada | Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus! http://www.lafferty.ca/ | http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------+-----------------------------------------------
