On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 sometime, David T-G wrote:
> Let's see... So you want the headers to look like
>
> To: TheGuys
> Bcc: joe@, jack@, tony@
>
> or perhaps just
>
> To: TheGuys: joe@, jack@, tony@;
>
> The second entry is your key, and you'll find that the first entry will
> actually look like
>
> To: TheGuys :;
>
> when it's properly written.
>
> If you want the first entry's behavior, you can probably whip up a
> send-hook command that will act when sending to all three of these
> fellows and rewrite the To: and Bcc: headers appropriately. I don't
> believe there's a way to recognize an alias itself but instead the
> resolved addresses, so that might get sticky.
>
> %
> % Perhaps these 2 features are planned for a future release?
>
> The former won't (can't!) happen, and the latter is already possible :-)
Actually I didn't understand your above reply but worked it out anyway...
For anyone reading this later...
All you do is put anything in the to: field to begin with. Then after
editing your message add the real alias to the bcc: field and then edit out
the to: field with either nothing (that is make it blank) or TheGuys:;
In the first case mutt adds "undisclosed recipients:;" in the to:
field
ps: The first behaviour mentioned in my original post can be obtained by a
shell script using mailx so it sort of "can" happen :-)
--
** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Aleks L. Owczarek
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne, Vic, 3010, Australia.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
