On 12-Feb-2002 17:31 Steffen Evers wrote:
|
| I have reported about the following problem on Feb 05th, but no one
| had a solution. For me, it looks like that this is not my bad
| configuration, but an unintended behavior of mutt (=> BUG). Am I
| correct or not?
While what you're trying to do seems perfectly reasonable (to me),
I don't think it's possible to modify To:, Cc:, Bcc:, or Subject:
using a send-hook. Well, yes it's possible, but you'll always
suffer from this "current message Bcc is based on last message's
send-hook" problem. The (extremely simplified) code looks something
like this:
process_send_hooks();
process_user_header();
edit_message();
Your hook is being processed in process_send_hooks(), but the header
modification (Bcc) is ignored in process_user_header(). The Bcc
change will take effect for the next message.
--
-Dale
