David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...and then Shawn McMahon said... >> If you do that, make sure you local-sign, not sign for export. The latter >> would be a big no-no. The gpg and pgp documention goes into these subjects >> in depth, IIRC. > > We even had that whole discussion here a while back. Rob, when was that?
One more question popped in my mind; when GnuPG automagicly fetches a key of some person and verifies it, it goes to the key list (I mean, that I can check it out with 'gpg --list-keys'). Does this mean, that it is signed? If it does, is it lsigned or signed for export? Because I have a *lots* of keys now, which I can view ith --list-keys option for gpg... and I'm not so experienced yet, that I could tell if they are signed or not. Sorry, if the answer is self-evident and the question's stupid, but I'd just like to know... -- Jussi Ekholm | And Jesus is on opium and Jesus needs a fix [EMAIL PROTECTED] | And Jesus is a suffering slave to ritualistic sex http://erppimaa.cjb.net/ | Singing love brother love... ekh @ IRCNet | Singing love brother love...
msg26130/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
