26-Mar-02 at 17:35, Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > No I haven't received an answer. I think it's just not supported in > this context. > The workaround is to put a send-hook for each mailinglist. But not > very elegant...
If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your muttrc. The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply to the list only. Mutt will send the correct headers if you use L. So use L ;-) Simon. -- [Simon White. vim/mutt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GIMPS:56.51% see www.mersenne.org] Not only does Jesus save, but he makes nightly off-site backups. [Arbitrary quotes signature rotation, a simple bash script by Simon White]
