On 06/10/02, 05:39:00PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> John --
>
> ...and then John P Verel said...
> %
> % This may just be me, but it seems to me that 1.4 is considerably
> % "snappier" than 1.2.5 was. It's about 50K larger, and this is compiled
> % on this particular machine, versus rpm installed.
>
> Who knows; it might still stand some stripping and get even smaller :-)
>
This puppy's already been stripped, per Sven.
>
> %
> % Does this make sense? Have others noticed this?
>
> I haven't noticed it specifically, but that's because I stuck with the
> 1.3 tree for quite a while; I haven't used 1.2.5 in a long time.
>
> I know that a lot of improvements have been made, so I'm not at all
> surprised.
>
>
> %
> % John
>
>
> Enjoy & HAND
>
> :-D
> --
> David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
> (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
> (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
>
