Hi,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 21:33]:
>* Thorsten Haude [02-07-11 21:28:53 +0200] wrote:
>> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-11 01:30]:
>
>> > :source contrib/gpg.rc
>
>> >does it help?
>
>> Nope.
>
>That was one of the first things I did when I discovered
>those problems. Now that I know that a MTA in my mailpath
>has a broken mbox parser I can verify a few of those bad
>mails. A few which I can't verify remain.
Could you tell more about this? How did you identify the broken MTA
and what did you do to fix it?
>David provided some other tips which didn't help for me.
I sure tried to follow that thread but David's mails are much harder
to read than the others.
>So I just commented out the code producing the message in mutt
>("Signature could NOT be verified"). It's ugly but it works for me.
Errr.. That means you disabled verifying?
Thorsten
--
The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away for expedients.
- Edmund Burke
