On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:22:32AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Thanks for your response.
| * Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 03:11:37 +0200] wrote: | | > What I would like to try is | > 1) first group the messages according to the thread they are in | | set sort=threads | | > 2) for each thread, sort the thread itself with date-received | | 2) doesn't make sence since a thread is already sorted by | 1) (according to headers). | | > 3) order the threads (relative to other threads) in | > reverse-date-received order | | set sort_aux=reverse-date-received That doesn't achieve the effect I want. Here is an example : ~~~~~~~ with sort_aux=reverse-date-received 91 r L Jul09 Kurt Lieber (1.2K) Re: return-path user -- local vs. smtp 92 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(1.3K) |-> 93 L Jul10 Philip Hazel (0.4K) | `-> 94 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(0.2K) | |-> 95 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(0.9K) | `-> 96 L Jul10 Philip Hazel (0.7K) |-> 97 F Jul09 Derrick 'dman' Hu(0.8K) `-> ~~~~~~~ Notice how, at the same thread level, the older message is at the bottom. (in particular, compare messages 92, 96, and 97. What I want is for that thread to look like this, but still have indices 91-97 (that is, be near the top of the folder) : ~~~~~~~ example with sort_aux=date-received 554 r L Jul09 Kurt Lieber (1.2K) Re: return-path user -- local vs. smtp 555 F Jul09 Derrick 'dman' Hu(0.8K) |-> 556 L Jul10 Philip Hazel (0.7K) |-> 557 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(1.3K) `-> 558 L Jul10 Philip Hazel (0.4K) `-> 559 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(0.9K) |-> 560 L Jul10 Alexander Saboure(0.2K) `-> ~~~~~~~ Notice how the thread itself is in 'date-received' order. However, I want the threads (eg if I collapse-all and then only count the visible messages) to be reverse-date-received. Does this make sense now? Do you see how what I want is different from 'sort=threads sort_aux=reverse-date-received'? -D -- Better a little with righteousness than much gain with injustice. Proverbs 16:8 http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/
msg29623/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature