* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-23 15:32]: > * On 2002.07.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > * "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so this adds at least 120K.. with *any* mutt. > > Well, it's rather orthogonal. Mutt has extensible > line-editing, history, and filename completion already. > Using readline would mean losing your "editor menu" keystroke > bindings, and changing the interface somewhat, too.
now, i'm sure mutt users will want to bind *all* commands - including those of the input lines. losing this is not an option. > Fulfilling the request is probably somewhat simpler; > just a matter of allowing the filename completion that > eg the mailbox browser allows inside the usual command > line. But I haven't checked to code to verify this. > Maybe I will.... please do! i am sure many users will be thankful for that! i know i will! > Readline isn't really suitable for mutt in any shape. i'm sure the request will become a FAQ at some point... *sigh* Sven [lookin forward to more commands with filename completion]
