On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 16:00:47 at 04:00:47PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> i'd rather not bundle mutt with all utilities. after all,
> many people might not have a need for these at all.
>
I agreee 100% on this. A "mutt-utils.rpm" would be extremely useful
for newbies (as I mentioned in my other message), but would only
bother the expert that already know such add-ons.
The two packages have to remain separate, to avoid bloat.
> what's needed is better documentation with hint for download,
> installation, configuration, setup examples and links to webpages.
>
Yes, but as a complement. The "utils" package would contain stuff that
has been proved to work with the corresponding version of mutt, and
example config files as well. The two things don't overlap.
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
Red Hat 7.3 in 8 MB of RAM: www.rule-project.org/
--
We need to focus on how to be productive, not just active.
Scott McNealy, chairman, CEO, and cofounders, Sun Microsystems.
