> From: "Calum Selkirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:03:20 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mutt + pcre
i somehow missed the Sven's message, so i'm replying to this one
> * Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [2002-08-02 13:57 +0200]:
> > * Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-02 11:35]:
> >
> > > if mutt could be ./configure'd --with-pcre (nondefault, of course),
> > > there'd be virtually no problems with confusion between regexps
> > > found in various published .muttrc's and the syntax mutt linked with
> > > pcre actually expected.
> >
> > assuming this is true - who would
> > (1) prepare the transition?
> > (2) write the patches?
> > (3) write the documentation?
> > (4) update the setup files?
> > any takers?
2 i cannot do
will gladly take 3
what exactly mean 1 and 4?
> Sven,
>
> "if" is generally regarded as a conditional and is never in and of
> itself "true" but predicated on meeting certain conditions (in this
> case 1,2,3,4)
>
> To add to your list of Q's:
>
> (0) what exactly is a "bullshit detector"?
> (0.1) is it worth discussing something even "if" only theoreticly?
> (0.2) return to 0?
Calum, i'm not sure how to parse your message. Does the #0 above
suggest that what i'm saying is bullshit?
--
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
3:51PM up 2 days, 23:27, 10 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.03, 0.06
