* On 2002.08.02, in <20020802115532.GC12347@erpland>,
* "Jussi Ekholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
> instead of mutt-dev]
Maybe, but it's also a request for someone to further develop the
documentation. :)
> Anyway, what if I want Mutt to sort all mailing list folders first by
> thread, then by date (most recent last) and finally by score; like Slrn
> does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring show me some
> examples of how you sort the folders?
I don't believe you can, until Daniel's latest threading patches make
it into 1.5.n, n>=2. The new patches will isolate threading from
sorting, so that you enable or disable threads but still have two sort
parameters.
> This interests me greatly, as well.
>
> > Can scoring only be used in sorting?
>
> I'm quite sure. Or if it couldn't be used, my knowledge about 'scoring'
> (which comes from using Slrn) is very narrow and I simply don't
> understand how scoring is effectively and powerfully applied in Mutt...
No, the "~n" pattern operator evaluates scores. You can color, limit,
search, etc. based on scores. E.g.:
macro index ! "<limit>~n 500-<enter>" \
"Show only the really important stuff"
But I don't know a lot. I don't use scoring, because I find that I have
to use it consistently for all my mail to make it useful for any of my
mail.
--
-D. Fresh fruit enriches everyone. Takes the thirst
Sun Project, APC/UCCO out of everyday time. A pure whiff of oxygen,
University of Chicago painting over a monochrome world in primary colors.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We all know that. It's why everyone loves fruit.