On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 07:08:53PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 17:52 +0200]:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > * Mat Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-12 14:58 +0100]:
> > > Look for index_format. I think you want to replace %L with %F.
> >
> > Sorry, I somehow missed that section.
>
> No problem.
>
> > One point: the definition of %L seems wrong (s/"lists"/"subscribe").
>
> I don't think so. It behaves with known lists exactly like with
> subscribed lists. And every subscribed list is a known list.
> | Every subscribed mailing list is known. To mark a mailing list as
> | known, use the ``lists'' command. To mark it as subscribed, use
> | ``subscribe''.
>
> But it could be more clear. You could submit a bug report with flea
> for it.
Well, my documentation (did I mention it was version 1.3.28i) of
the %L variable says, if I can copy it correctly (because I've
never found out how to combine "r" and "-i"):
If an address to the To or CC header field
matches an address defined by the user's
"lists" command, this displays "To <list-
name>", otherwise the same as %F.
For me, just using "lists" gets me the sender's name, while
using "subscribe" gets me "To <listname>". Unless there is
something wrong with my setup somewhere, that definition is
actually wrong. Substituting "subscribe" for "lists" would
correct it.
David
>
> Nicolas
>
> PS:
> Mail-Followup-To: David Jardine <blu>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ??
