* Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 20:12]:
> I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction
> between PGP/MIME and Outlook et al that refuse to show signed messages.
yes - someone ought to tell the creators or outlook about RFC2015..
> They apparently know enough MIME to recognize that they can't
> handle "multipart/signed" and don't look inside for the text/plain
> part. I wonder if a separate unsigned text/plain with a small
> warning about the contents not being verified would be appropriate?
RFC2015. nuff said.
but as for handling the traditionl pgp" messages -
have you checked out the command "check-traditional-pgp"
and the variable "pgp_create_traditional" yet?
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
this version was announced on
2001-08-30 - almost a year ago.
in the meantime Thomas Roessler added
the "pgp_create_traditional" command.
so i think you should upgrade. ;-)
Sven [it's time for M$ software to follow RFCs!]
=== from the mutt-1.4/ChangeLog :
Tue Mar 26 22:25:48 2002 Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* commands.c, ...
OK, I'm giving up: pgp_create_traditional now creates text/plain;
x-mutt-action={pgp-encrypt,pgp-sign}.
Tue Feb 13 23:42:29 2001 Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* commands.c, ...
Add a function check-traditional-pgp which can be used to
handle old-style PGP messages and/or parts more easily.
