On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > That is why I think it would be much better to have manual charset
> > override for headers, just like the one we have for bodies.
> > IMHO, this functionality should be implemented in MUA.
> 
> this would only work around the problems
> created by bad mail clients, wouldn't it?

Yes, and "only" would be sufficient for me :) .


> > However, mutt is the best MUA
> > with regard to bad input tolerance. I think it
> > lacks this feature, which is already implemented
> > in the source, but is inapplicable to headers.  I
> 
> somehow the prospect of mutt becoming a repair tool for
> the brokenness of other mailers does not make me happy.

With respect for your opinion. However, I like mutt especially for these
features, and I think such features give it flexibility -- mutt's main
strength, IMHO.


> i'd rather tell other users to not use the broken
> mailers at all and thereby let them die.
> life's too short for bad software.

Life's too short to convince all users of bad software :) .


So, let me restate my question: I'm looking for a local way to convert
unquoted or malquoted headers. I would greatly appreciate any help
regarding the pipes, or Japanese patches doing header conversion, or
any method that would work with IMAP mailboxes.


Thanks in advance,
Baurjan.

Reply via email to