> well - "reply" to your own mail and add the missing info. > you could use the resend-mail command, of course, > but that might start a new thread.
What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own mail id, even if it is not a reply but a resending of my own mail. > > Here, I am not refering to replies or follow-ups on mailing lists. > then what? One applicable situation could be when I would like to arrange a meeting, with someone (say Beth). However, after sending the first mail, I discover that I forget to say when the meeting is going to take place. I resend the mail with the date and time. I do not consider this as a reply and, thus, In-reply-to should not be set, but only References (according to RFC2076, para 3.6). Though, I may be to restrictive in definition of reply. What I had in mind in my original thinking was to have a quadoption question in the resend function for including the reference of the original mail. That would keep the To: field intact. Anders
