* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 18:08:10 +0100: > =- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 14:19:16 +0100 -= > >>> Then to suffice your requirement you could simply bind the "n" >>> key to a macro that does the above /and/ executes >>> <search-next>. >> >> Hm, I'm too dense, I tried, but everything leaves me on the >> message that was marked -- marking the message doesn't perform >> the actual search, and once I've done the hotkey search I'm back >> on the marked message without having marked the message where I >> came from. > > The idea, not litral mutt code, look up details. > Works only assuming you don't use "Flag"ing for other purposes, > and have 'wrap_search=yes'. > > a) jump next new:
let's call that message "a" > macro ... <unflag-all><flag><next-new> only "a" is _flagged_ > b) jump last seen: let's call this one "b" > macro ... <mark><search-flagged><enter><unflag> "b" is _marked_, jump to "a", unflag "a", everything unflagged. Now, to go back to "b", I'd need /another/ last-seen-macro that jumps to _marked_. Apart from the fact that I need flagging for it's proper purpose, I still don't see it could be done that way. c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html>
