=- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 3:50:31 -0500 -= > Lo, if I do it using > -i messagebody.txt > instead of with > < messagebody.txt > then it gets FCC'd, and even has my signature appended (which > does not happen with the method that won't FCC either). > > Come to think of it, this has spawned another question. When I > use '<' instead of '-i', I am not even prompted for a password, > which I assume is because mutt doesn't need me to interact with > msmtp. But when I use '-i', Mutt *does* prompt me for my > password (IMAP), even though msmtp doesn't need it, and even > though I am not checking my inbox. What's up with this?
I guess your fcc-folder is on IMAP?! If '<' doesn't do any fcc'ing, then, of course, you won't be asked. If '-i' OTOH does, then it can't save fcc without your IMAP-PW. -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
