Hi Hein! On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Hein Zelle wrote:
> this has probably been mentioned before, but I'll toss it up anyway. > What's the general opinion about storing mutt settings in a > centralized place, e.g. on an imap server? I find that, using mutt from > 3 different places accessing the same imap server, it gets tedious to > synchronize settings and aliases and save-hooks. There even exist Protocols that would specify such things. I believe these are ACAP and IMSP. But aside from Mulberry which seems to support such extensions, I don't think that mutt supports it currently. I would definitly like such support. My current workaround is storing the configuration data on an subversion host. regards, Christian -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 145. You e-mail your boss, informing him you'll be late.
