Gary Johnson wrote: [Mon Jul 09 2007, 05:43:51PM EDT] > On 2007-07-09, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I can tell, there's no way to determine in a send-hook if > > the message is a reply. Is that right? > > > > This is the most obvious thing to try, but it doesn't work because ~h > > is invalid in the context of a send-hook: > > > > send-hook '=h In-Reply-To:' ... > > > > Here's what I'm using presently, but I'd prefer something more > > definitive: > > > > send-hook '~s "^Re:"' ... > > Would a reply-hook work for you?
Nope, because what I'm really trying to do is match messages that are *not* replies. Additionally I want to keep my hooks in order, which reply-hook breaks. Thanks, Aron
