On Sa, 11.08, 08:42, Gary Funck wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:34:17PM +0200, tannhauser wrote: > > Well, you know the mutt vs. patches thing, do you?
> I've just begun to use mutt more as my main e-mail program, > preferring its simplicity to some of the more whiz-bang > GUI mail readers. So, I haven't heard about the > "mutt vs. patches thing". What is that all about? short story: mutt-ng forked because mutt was pretty famous for just fixing security issues and not giving a shit about any user-requested features or integrating some of the dozens of useful patches. but i think that changed a bit. at least, i'm pretty happy with mutt (ok, patched with the sidebar-patch. can't live without it).
