On Wednesday, 29 August 2007 at 10:11, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, August 29 at 09:06 AM, quoth Brendan Cully: > >> Oddly, mutt does not do this in the edit_one_message() function > >> which I think is the one being used in this case. I think this > >> should be fixed. If folks agree and unless someone else wants to > >> go for it, I can submit a patch. > > > > That sounds like a good idea. But it would probably be good to set > > the mtime back to its original time after editing if the message > > isn't modified. > > Out of curiosity, why? Mutt's just gonna delete that temporary file... > deleted files with slightly incorrect mtimes are just as gone.
Whoops, right. I'd assumed mutt edited the message in place, but of course it doesn't. Time for coffee...
