Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2007, Kyle Wheeler ha scritto: > Yes. When you use the ^ in your pattern, you're telling it to match > the beginning of the address (the $ at the end tells it to match the > end of the address). Thus [EMAIL PROTECTED] will ONLY match "@debian" and > nothing else---it will not match [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] either. ;) > If you use this hook instead: > > send-hook '~t @debian$' 'my_hdr From: Mutt User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > > ...then it WILL match all three examples I listed above, but will NOT > match [EMAIL PROTECTED] (because the $ at the end is still > there). Make sense?
It looks very resonnable, only that... I've still a trouble. I adopted the hook you suggested me. Now: in "sent" the headers look correct. The voice From is set just to "samiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". But when I controll in "inbox" after the delivering of email, I find again the old external address and not that one specified by the hook: "samiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" I'm very confused, but I suspect that Exim rewrite the address furnished by Mutt with that one present in /etc/mail.addresses... Maybe, there is something to change in exim.conf too... M. -- linux user no.: 353546 public key at http://keyserver.linux.it
