* Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-05-08 07:45]: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:40:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote: > > * On 2008.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > * "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Have you got a "%D" in your set attribution="On ... wrote:"?
he probably does not as that in mutt would not accomplish what you describe. Look at "man muttrc" and you will find, %n <%a> > On some lists you can get flamed for including the email address in the > attribution, (or anywhere in the body, I presume.), ... something about > "address havesters". It was interesting to note that the list(s) > mentioned had windoze users as subscribers, i.e. vim_use and a cygwin > list. What makes it easier to get the addresses from the body than from the header? They appear both places. > I notice the mutt default setting for the attribution doesn't include > the email address (%D?). :^) -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
