On Tuesday, 06 January 2009 at 22:32, Tobias Mummert wrote: > * Brendan Cully [2009-01-06 22:14 CET]: > > > > > A backtrace would be great. > > > > > > Mutt hasn't produced a core file. > > > > > > What can I do now? > > > > Both cases are covered on that page. I've emboldened things a bit to > > make it easier to read. > > Great, thank you very much, Brendan! > > Here is my back trace: ... > (no debugging symbols found) > > warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error. ... > Core was generated by `/root/tmp/mutt1519 -d5'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > [New process 13740] > #0 0x0806eb0b in ?? () > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x0806eb0b in ?? () > #1 0x08204988 in ?? () > #2 0x080d9a35 in ?? () > #3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Hmm, that didn't go very well. Can you try the other strategy, running mutt inside of gdb? Also, -d2 is plenty.
