-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 20 at 06:17 AM, quoth George Davidovich:
>> Mutt separates correctly the text and my signature (from the file
>> ~/.elm/signature) in the body by inserting the '-- \n' line;
>
> Mutt does does indeed do that, but it's syntax hilighting won't work for
> format-flowed messages,
Really?
This message I'm sending right now is a format-flowed message, and as
far as I can tell, the syntax highlighting works perfectly. What makes
you say that it doesn't?
> or for "badly-formatted" signatures containing a blank line
Sure. There are always limits to how much software can read your mind.
> or a line beginning with a 'From' that has had a '>' prepended after
> the fact. ;-)
....?
I haven't used Mutt on a raw mbox in a long time (I use it on either
IMAP or Maildir mailboxes) so I haven't had to deal with that kind of
silliness and I can't see what you're talking about. But what what's
that got to do with signatures?
~Kyle
- --
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.
-- Winston Churchill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkl2IwEACgkQBkIOoMqOI17X1wCgs6QURap/tOsoVh867j9HnO4l
ZisAnRgIdxGMwmOflrK0YpO64soA9NyY
=bm/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
