-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 10 at 01:10 PM, quoth J. Limon:
> Also, is it just me or does this list not have a proper reply-to ?
> When I hit reply it tried to reply directly to you.
I never noticed. I think there's an argument to be had about reply-to
mangling by mailing lists, but I avoid the problem entirely: I use
mutt's <list-reply> function to reply to all mailing list messages (by
default, this is bound to the L key, I think).
And before you protest "that's annoying! What if I forget?", let me
stop you right there. Why forget? MUTT TO THE RESCUE! I figure I
almost *always* want to list-reply when I'm replying to a mailing-list
message, right? So, I rebind the 'r' key with... you guessed it:
HOOKS! (Have I mentioned that I *love* hooks?)
The easiest way to do this is with a message-hook:
message-hook . 'bind pager l list-reply; bind pager r reply'
message-hook ~l 'bind pager r list-reply; bind pager l reply
Eh? Eh? Cool, no? (the ~l matches all mailing-list messages) Of
course, that doesn't help in the INDEX, and it's impossible to change
the key bindings based on the message that's *SELECTED*, so I match
based on the folder I'm in (which is virtually always what I want to
do):
folder-hook . \
'bind index l list-reply; bind index r reply'
folder-hook "Subscribed" \
'bind index r list-reply; bind index l reply'
Make sense?
~Kyle
- --
Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on
what to have for dinner.
-- James Bovard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAknfgMUACgkQBkIOoMqOI16I/QCgsCxoWPuuehepTo3Uf0sJfCrH
myAAn0WlJne9smvzsdihQV1rPCBzHjOs
=IzUm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
