Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Sunday, April 26 at 10:15 AM, quoth Rocco Rutte:
> > The question is how much people read need this. To me polling for new > > mail when I'm ready to read new mail would make more sense than a low > > $mail_check value where you're not interested in new mail most of the > > time. > That makes a lot of sense to me. Since I use IMAP, I often use > <imap-fetch-mail>, which seems to simply force mutt to check for new > messages. Having something that isn't IMAP-specific would be even > better. Yeah. However, we're still in feature freeze. Adding a function that polls by force would be easy, but I don't know if I'm allowed to push that. Rocco
