also sprach Kyle Wheeler <kyle-m...@memoryhole.net> [2009.12.05.0146 +0100]: > >I haven't checked recently either; when I get some time, I'll fire up > >the ole XP virtual machine to check it out. > > Unfortunately, all I have is MS Office 2000, which is too old to work > with GPG4Win.
I tried it, and GpgOL does indeed to proper MIME by now. The major problem with GpgOL, despite its nice integration, is that you can either enforce encrypt-to-all and require the users to acknowledge unencrypted outgoing mails (which will be the majority), or you can rely on them to encrypt mails manually. Since I don't trust users and the first option will just train them to blindly click away the dialogue, GpgOL is not suitable (although I will write in to the team and suggest a policy-based approach). I am now investigating GPGrelay[0], which has a few warts but looks promising. It also does PGP/MIME and it has policy-based rules to enforce encryption to certain recipients (when a key is known), plus the ability to map wildcard addresses to keys. 0. http://sites.inka.de/tesla/gpgrelay.html -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "it usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech. -- mark twain spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
