* Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> [03-31-10 11:46]: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find > > it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of > > screen's *features* more functional such as split screen w/o using one of > > the screen numbers that allow direct access (<ctrl-a>2). Tmux uses > > <ctrl-b> rather than <ctrl-a>, and allows direct access to > 10 screens, > > buffers, .... > > This is all completely OT, but... using <ctrl-b> is an absolute > non-starter as it's an emacs-mode editing character.
As in screen, the <prefix-key> is configurable with "bind-key" and there are vi and emacs key modes. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
