On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:12:54PM -0900, Roger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:53:22PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
> >    (e)ncrypt - presumably encrypts the message and, when it asks "Enter
> >    keyID for [email protected]: " one enters the keyID for the *recipient*.
> >    This had me fooled initially, I guess it's obvious when you think
> >    about it but not straight away.
> >
> >    (s)ign - presumably 'signs' the message to prove (maybe!) it's from
> >    me. 
> >
> >    (s)ign as - what does this do?
> 
> Sign as or with "another user/key"?
> 
> >    (b)oth - presumably encrypts and signs the message
> 
> Yes, both - sign & encrypt. 
> 
> >    (i)nline - is this just the old-fashioned way of doing it?
> To the best of my knowledge as well, sign inline instead of attach.
> 
> From what I understand, attaching is standard nowadays.
> 
> >    (c)lear - do nothing? I.e. I hit 'p' by mistake
> This I agree is misleading.  Took me a month to figure-out this really meant
> "exit" and not my mislead interpretation of "clear sign"... although GNUPG
> doesn't have this option?
> 
> Most of these option explanations can be found within the GNUPG (gpg) man 
> page.
> 
Thanks! :-)  That's got me most of the way.

-- 
Chris Green

Reply via email to